A new perspective on voice, thought as an instrument and a player in the same body and soul, and the necessity of a focused work to obtain the best instrument and the best player possibles.A perspective useful for beginners, professionals and in rehabilitate field.
I use the term Lutist in the ancient definition of a string instrument maker, and I talk about a new perspective in the voice instrument due to the real possibility of working on the voice we have to change into a better instrument exactly in the same way we can work on wood to have a good violin from it. When someone wants to learn to play violin or piano or guitar he uses an instrument made by a craftsman and the instrument is yet a proper violin or guitar and after the use it is normally put in a protective case or stay in a proper home that will not damage it too much. That is not the case with the voice. Our body is made and modified by our entire life: habits, physical activity, coordination, what we eat and drink, our hormonal balance and changes, physical accidents, surgeries. Our voice is our body, not only an abstract breath flowing and vocal chords. Our voice is made by our vocal chords as a piano is made by its chords, it is just a part of it and the most fragile one; without many other parts working properly and shaped properly they can’t make well their part, and in my experience that’s from where many tone-deaf voices come. I dream a day where tone-deaf will be no more an ear judgment but in most cases a body shape form to modify and so to render perfect pitch possible in the correct range of that voice. I found that it is possible to work on those deficiencies directly. When we were born we were not born as a voice-body but as a body. Singing, even if can seem so natural in some, is not that natural and requires unnatural coordination and specific settlements of some parts and we have to deal with that. The vocal technique developed on the centuries in a complete and reliable technique is the well known Belcanto technique and structured on tradition and Garcia Method, Matilde Marchesi and all the corpus of voice exercises as Concone, Panofka, Rossini are in that path. Maria Malibran, Lilli Lehman, Mirella Freni, Beniamino Gigli, Giulietta Simionato are representative of that kind of tradition. It was developed on classical music necessities, and it is useful in its whole for the classical sound and not for the very different and also evolving characteristics of the others kind of music. It contains however in itself the principles of the voice, and those don’t change even when the sound changes. I studied with Giannella Borelli (I often had lessons after Sumi Jo or Chiara Taigi) and Anna di Stasio, two representatives of Italian belcanto School, and I was very lucky in that. My singing, my technique and now my work is in the sequel of those principles and school, and the good and physiological results I obtain are certainly due to that. In this method the work on the body as well as the learning of playing the instrument voice are made at the same time and vocalisation is in the purpose of both the results. To have a development of the same good results in a different kind of sound I have found and defined a corpus of different exercises, with and without sounds that have been useful even in cases of damaged vocal chords and helpful to gain a more healthful state. What is new in my method is just the approach to voice and vocal problems, the adjustment of those instruments to one single person: not everybody requires the same settlement, the possible sounds are so many and the path is to discover together which is the proper sound of the body and the soul of that person. A technique to me is not a only and absolute method leading to the same results everyone but the instrument to make music without damaging ourselves, it is a craft and a freedom, for professionals or amateurs. The voice is the deepest expression of someone and can’t fit the same way to everybody, it is not an abstraction and we don’t have to be submitted having a bad sound just because we have a bad coordination in breathing and we don’t know how to overcome that. It is a work useful for beginners in all styles, for professionals who would explore different possibilities in their instrument and sometimes, in accordance and under phoniatric control, in rehabilitative field.
What is breathing for singing? What is correct breathing? Is it different from normal correct breathing? What are the muscles related? Which muscles have we to work to obtain a good singing breath?
The ancient methods talk about an appoggio (a sort of stand, of pillar) the voice find in a correct breath and of floating on the breath, of singing on the soffio (a gentle, very gentle blow) of the breathing. When we do sing well we lose the exact perception of the air going out and we just perceive a sound around us and a sort of lightness mixed to a sense of solidity and that’s what we call appoggio. How can we find appoggio? This is one of the most important questions of singing. It is normally the result of a good technique work, and it is essential to have the pressure without effort to make the vocal folds work properly. It is in some sort the way to make air become sound and energy, and not a rough blowing air. I tell my students to imagine that with appoggio air becomes water, a living water on which we surf. A sea or a lake or an ocean, it depends on the music we are singing, but not a geyser going out but something that become elastic on which we can float and jump and play surfing on the waves. It is a sort of pressure the air will have under the larynx that you will not feel as a pressure in a water gun for garden ready to be open, but just a freedom and a consistence in the body. This because we can augment the pressure by breathing out the air or by creating an opposition between the muscles of expiration and those which provoke inspiration. In the first case we will have not a good air for singing while in the second case all our air will become ready to become just sound and not to be rough to our larynx or vocal folds. I found very useful the osteopathic conception of breathing which is not that far from yoga conception (the true things relate all to the same, just the use or the path to join those is different). To osteopathy we have three horizontal structures involved in breathing: one under clavicular, the proper diaphragm and the pelvic diaphragm. Those horizontal structures in a good respiration move accorded one to the other. The clavicular for the voice is involved in the throat opening (also Jerzy Grotowski found that evidence in his acting technique), the proper diaphragm goes up and down in exhalation and inhalation, and it is just involuntary as the hearth. The pelvic one is composed by muscles that make lateral and backward-forward movement. A great part of singing technique is related to the possibility in controlling the diaphragm by the structures to which is anchored, and many are absolutely useful and good for many purposes. The new step I found in my experience is to control the effort and the wrong attack of sound by the training or retraining of pelvic diaphragm, which is directly related to the proper diaphragm. We can have easy pressure by opposing voluntarily the inspiratory muscles of pelvic diaphragm during phonation. I found very healthy to coordinate sound attack to a muscular inspiration through some studied movements that will have the result of an opposition of inspiratory and expiratory forces and a phonation with no effort. When this opposition is present the voice has the appoggio. With this simple appoggio and without a voluntary use of all the sustain muscles normally used in vocal technique in my experience I find an easy elastic voice that permits to work on faulty coordination of others part of the instrument voice. For a performing voice it will lack of some support sometimes, but it will be easy to add it when the fundamental defaults are extinguished and the gain in term of capacity of shaping new coordination is quite relevant. In a not so faulty voice I will add the necessary support by appropriate vocalisation and by appropriate repertoire. I usually wait the moment in which the attack of the sound has joined a good automatic coordination so to seem totally natural to teach the voluntary supports to obtain a voluntary work on sound more refined. The pelvic diaphragm often is not properly working and I have developed many exercises to work it and relate it to the voice, exercise anybody of any age can do. Results have been surprising also to me in profesional singers with or without problems, in some damaged vocal folds, in adolescents during the changing of the voice.
I often work with young and very young singers, some of them with genuine attitude and powerfully talented. I just teach singing and not music for young age, so the minimum I require is to verify in the first weeks the authentic desire of learning that only can make them be happy in short or less short vocal lessons, without wasting time and parent’s money. When they are very talented they desire to feed that talent with good music and after a little also to give that music to someone in the form of performance. I am not totally against young in performances, broadcastings and competitions, but there are some rules that I find important in all my teaching that should be followed and I see that often are not. All the talented persons I have met of young age showed a double in them: a young person and that talent that when real is out of age. The talent is adult and experimented, not the person who contains that talent. Talent has some necessities that can be very light to the talented and forced requests to the other. I think that nothing is bad if we just don’t hide young singers performances, if we let a space of existence to the characteristics of young persons. In my experience their performances are plenty of fluctuation in the level, in the technique control and in the musical depth. If we want to moderate that before their experienced technique make that fluctuation so little that you don’t really perceive it you will make of them little robot performers and that is what I really can’t bear. I can’t bear to see a little singer having the pressure of making a good performance for a tv public or to make happy people around him and not simply a gentle and respectful way to share and rejoice the music that this little singer desires to give us. Music is giving something to the others in a form correct and acceptable, since when this is possible by the technique level I agree and organize for my students to perform in private or less private or public situations, but always, and I mean always respecting the freedom of being just what they are at that moment, with their qualities and lacks. We are teachers in a path to help them become in the time musicians if they will desire that and if they have the talent to, or simply to enjoy and practice music with correct basis, not teachers who have to show their good teaching by the incredible performances of little robots performers. We have to help them to make and experiment and refine the music they have inside, not to use it for our pleasure or business, and the difference is clear and sometimes very subtle. You will never find before the correct time one of my student required to be “perfect”, they will always have from me the request to have the courage of having the pleasure of performing and the courage of trying what the inside is asking to have music, and after we will discuss and choose what was good, healthy, not too plenty of risk but in their sense of their imagination, of their musical universe, of their musical dream. The level is something that raise all together when it is well conducted, and can be so easy to make one perfect or two perfect songs during one year, but that will not raise the entire level in a balanced and grounded way. I teach to beginners and they have the right to be what they are during the time they get stronger and more solid and stable in their results, and no tv Show or Competition or parent or manger should put the pressure on them of not being enough or to have to do something far from their genuine talent just to make someone happy of them.
The same is to to be said on the vocal performance and the risk of abusing so young instruments: they are growing and they are elastic and not strongly structured instruments. We learn adults not to do everything is possible for our voice to do, we must be much more careful to teach what is healthy and what at a certain age never must be allowed. Sometimes they find by themselves some high tones and too heavy notes that make everybody around them being excited, but in that we have to teach them well what can be done without risking the future of their voice and what will make it age prematurely and ruin it. When they are young they are often less protective toward themselves as adult are and I prefer not to teach what can be dangerous to be sure they will not use when nobody controls or just to be appreciated and loved. But young voice is then another subject.
Here I try to explain a little what in my work is different in perspective. I did not study music and singing in my childhood and when I entered the Conservatorio I had to fill the gap in an adult brain and body, with an evident talent but yet formed and structured. To do that I used part of the body-work knowledges and principles I learned in the Jacques Lecoq method Theater School which I followed. I asked myself how I could solve some of my most relevant defaults and make singing easy and plenty of all the colours and dynamics a voice can healthily produce to be all the music I had to sing and I wanted to sing. Inspired by Feldenkrais method’s results I invented a reprogramming possibility of movement patterns coordination that could become totally automatic and natural. I had a problem in the tongue that I discovered during the career (a short tongue frenulum, operated in 2002) that made a shorter vertical movement of the larynx so that the risk margin was very narrow in high notes; the complete depth of low range has appeared only after the surgery. However I didn’t want to give the sense of stiffness of a too controlled voice or not to sing Amneris or Wagner or Ravel or Bach. By studying in that way in addition to the vocalisation I could improve the skills of my technique so that nobody never thought I had a tongue problem. I added some new exercise made on the inspiration of the work with the italian osteopath Francesco Corvasce who changed forever my respiration conception, so to develop the breathing work as explained in here . Singers have a limitation in their daily practice, but two hours per day of plenty singing was certainly not enough to study well all we have to, so I found a way of studying without using the voice and the sound. There are many things we can do and solve and study without using a sound, but involving exactly as we were singing properly. so to work on every little part of the singing. The work I do is not based on merely repetition that many times lead to a studied and more structured default but by understanding what the problems are, to fragment it into simple components to work separately than to come back to the problem to control what has been really solved and so on till the complete resolution. I don’t work by improving a bad vocal gesture, but by creating a good new vocal gesture. I use in this purpose exercises, some sort of choreographies associated to the voice, my example. I normally use my example to propose the exact complex movement he has to do and if the student doesn’t think but just executes after me, without talking but just playing as children he will make a lot of what I am proposing even without knowing what he is doing. When a new gesture become possible and it is a better pattern to do something, the brain and the body will very often automatically choose that, and it will result natural. Only when used, some parts become felt by ourselves and to explain some movements is often unproductive. How can a person move something he even doesn’t feel or see, or that simply is out of his movement patterns? That’s why I use myself to obtain from the student doing something. I have noticed that if I execute something possible for the pupil with myself immediately before him, he will be able to reproduce it. The problem is to propose something possible for the student. I never make examples in my way of singing but shaping myself as the student instrument and than improving in me his positions and by asking of doing after me I normally have him in the ameliorated shape I put myself. I this way I never work directly on defaults but by using or creating good patterns. This gives a sense of calm and ease that helps the work, being the work on deficiencies a creator of stiffness that often renders impossible a good voice in beginners but also on professionals. The relevant defaults I normally face directly only when it will be possible to get free from them, and that’s happens in most cases during the second year and in that case it is no more a movement coordination to change, but a mental habit, the idea of a route to take immediately, and natural after all along. For the first period is like to seed a garden, and for the first part I ask not to study what we are doing, so to be sure that the different movement patters will not be changed by the student’s habits. I had to find something effective even with the voice that students use for speaking all the day and they are not yet able to understand or to feel what they are doing. When well sowed every little aspect will work by itself and the brain and body will choose the better pattern so that we don’t have to destroy the ancient bad route. The surprising thing for the student is the rapid feeling and evidence of starting having a good natural instrument and sometimes the sensation they are doing nothing to sing correctly, and that’s exactly how I work to have a better instrument. Of course this is just the starting point to sing well, but yet a good starting point.Then the real training will be done on good vocal patterns.